首页> 外文OA文献 >Towards a precise test for malaria diagnosis in the Brazilian Amazon: comparison among field microscopy, a rapid diagnostic test, nested PCR, and a computational expert system based on artificial neural networks
【2h】

Towards a precise test for malaria diagnosis in the Brazilian Amazon: comparison among field microscopy, a rapid diagnostic test, nested PCR, and a computational expert system based on artificial neural networks

机译:在巴西亚马逊地区进行疟疾诊断的精确测试:现场显微镜,快速诊断测试,嵌套式PCR和基于人工神经网络的计算专家系统之间的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Background Accurate malaria diagnosis is mandatory for the treatment and management of severe cases. Moreover, individuals with asymptomatic malaria are not usually screened by health care facilities, which further complicates disease control efforts. The present study compared the performances of a malaria rapid diagnosis test (RDT), the thick blood smear method and nested PCR for the diagnosis of symptomatic malaria in the Brazilian Amazon. In addition, an innovative computational approach was tested for the diagnosis of asymptomatic malaria. Methods The study was divided in two parts. For the first part, passive case detection was performed in 311 individuals with malaria-related symptoms from a recently urbanized community in the Brazilian Amazon. A cross-sectional investigation compared the diagnostic performance of the RDT Optimal-IT, nested PCR and light microscopy. The second part of the study involved active case detection of asymptomatic malaria in 380 individuals from riverine communities in Rondônia, Brazil. The performances of microscopy, nested PCR and an expert computational system based on artificial neural networks (MalDANN) using epidemiological data were compared. Results Nested PCR was shown to be the gold standard for diagnosis of both symptomatic and asymptomatic malaria because it detected the major number of cases and presented the maximum specificity. Surprisingly, the RDT was superior to microscopy in the diagnosis of cases with low parasitaemia. Nevertheless, RDT could not discriminate the Plasmodium species in 12 cases of mixed infections (Plasmodium vivax + Plasmodium falciparum). Moreover, the microscopy presented low performance in the detection of asymptomatic cases (61.25% of correct diagnoses). The MalDANN system using epidemiological data was worse that the light microscopy (56% of correct diagnoses). However, when information regarding plasma levels of interleukin-10 and interferon-gamma were inputted, the MalDANN performance sensibly increased (80% correct diagnoses). Conclusions An RDT for malaria diagnosis may find a promising use in the Brazilian Amazon integrating a rational diagnostic approach. Despite the low performance of the MalDANN test using solely epidemiological data, an approach based on neural networks may be feasible in cases where simpler methods for discriminating individuals below and above threshold cytokine levels are available.
机译:摘要背景准确的疟疾诊断是严重病例的治疗和管理所必需的。而且,无症状疟疾的个体通常不通过医疗机构进行筛查,这进一步使疾病控制工作复杂化。本研究比较了巴西亚马逊河地区疟疾快速诊断测试(RDT),浓血涂片法和巢式PCR在诊断症状性疟疾中的表现。此外,还测试了一种创新的计算方法来诊断无症状疟疾。方法研究分为两部分。在第一部分中,对来自巴西亚马逊最近城市化社区的311名患有疟疾相关症状的患者进行了被动病例检测。横断面研究比较了RDT Optimal-IT,嵌套式PCR和光学显微镜的诊断性能。该研究的第二部分涉及对来自巴西朗多尼亚河沿河社区的380名无症状疟疾进行积极病例检测。比较了使用流行病学数据的显微镜,巢式PCR和基于人工神经网络(MalDANN)的专家计算系统的性能。结果巢式PCR被证明是诊断有症状和无症状疟疾的金标准,因为它可以检测到大量病例并具有最大的特异性。令人惊讶的是,在诊断低寄生虫血症的病例中,RDT优于显微镜检查。然而,RDT不能区分12例混合感染(间日疟原虫+恶性疟原虫)的疟原虫种类。此外,显微镜检查在无症状病例的检测中表现不佳(正确诊断的61.25%)。使用流行病学数据的MalDANN系统比光学显微镜差(正确诊断的56%)。但是,当输入有关白细胞介素10和干扰素-γ血浆水平的信息时,MalDANN的性能显着提高(正确诊断率为80%)。结论用于疟疾诊断的RDT在巴西亚马逊地区采用合理的诊断方法可能会很有前景。尽管仅使用流行病学数据进行的MalDANN测试性能低下,但是在可以使用简单的方法来区分阈值细胞因子水平以上和以下的个体的情况下,基于神经网络的方法还是可行的。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号